Jae S. Cho, M.D
Registered Address: Ohio, USA (USA)
5 Questions to Ask Jae S. Cho, M.D Before Signing a Manufacturing Contract
Bring these exact questions to your discovery call with their QA Director or account rep before wiring a production deposit:
- Q1: On 2025-12-31, FDA cited 21 CFR 211.68(b) (Equipment Qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ), Calibration & Water Systems). Can your Quality Unit share the signed 15-day CAPA response and verification logs showing this gap is closed?
- Q2: On 2025-12-31, FDA cited 21 CFR 211.160(b)(2) (Finished Product Testing, Stability & Expiration Dating). Can your Quality Unit share the signed 15-day CAPA response and verification logs showing this gap is closed?
- Q3: Do you perform 100% FTIR/HPLC identity testing on incoming active ingredients in-house (21 CFR 111.75(a)(1)), or do you rely on vendor COAs?
- Q4: Will you sign our Quality Agreement Rider requiring 24-hour notification if an FDA investigator issues a Form 482 or Form 483 at FEI 3040335429?
- Q5: Can we review a redacted Master Manufacturing Record (MMR) and Batch Production Record (BPR) with dual-operator weight verification and yield reconciliation?
Cross-Database Regulatory & Inspection Timeline
Unified chronological history across FDA ORA Inspections, Form 483s, Warning Letters, Enforcement Recalls, and OASIS Import Refusals.
FDA Form 483 issued to Jae S. Cho, M.D (FEI 3040335429) on 2025-12-31 following an inspection of its clinical investigator operations in Ohio. The report documents 2 inspection observations centered on Equipment Qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ), Calibration & Water Systems, Finished Product Testing, Stability & Expiration Dating.
- 21 CFR 211.68(b) (Equipment Qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ), Calibration & Water Systems): Scales, thermometers, pH meters, autoclaves, or purified water systems lacking current NIST-traceable calibration or process validation.
- 21 CFR 211.160(b)(2) (Finished Product Testing, Stability & Expiration Dating): Releasing finished batches without verifying strength/potency/microbiological specs, or placing an expiration/best-by date on labels without supporting real-time or accelerated stability data.
Manufacturer Right-of-Reply & Free Match Correction
GUARDRAIL PROTECTEDTo ensure fairness and accuracy, facility owners may submit verified Form 483 closeout evidence, CAPA completion statements, or entity-resolution corrections free of charge. Sponsorship never alters an FDA Record Index score.
6-Subsystem cGMP Radar Breakdown
Sub-scores mapped across FDA's six core inspection subsystems.
Verified AAA/AA Co-Packers in This Sector
Compare or request quotes from top-rated contract manufacturers with clean FDA inspection histories:
Score Provenance Receipts
Every point in this facility's FDA Record Index (79/100) is backed by a linked government record (36-month half-life decay).
| Event | Date | Weight | Receipt |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inspection Outcome (VAI) | 2025-12-31 | -8.2 pts | INSP-483-3040335429-20251231 ↗ |
| Form 483 (2 observations, 0 repeat) | 2025-12-31 | -4.9 pts | 483-3040335429-20251231 ↗ |